Jeremy Utley wrote these words on 04/12/05 23:23 CST: > [snip] > That's the order my ALFS profile for BLFS runs in..it's not 100% > perfect, and it doesn't include everything, but it'll at least maybe > help you guys get a start on things.
Thanks for the input Jeremy, however, I'm not so much looking for a "start on things", as much as I'd like to see it the way it was. The sections were organized in the order that the packages should be built, and now they are alphabetical. We can't do anything about the packages that are dependencies of another that are in a different sections, but for packages that are dependencies in the same section, they should be organized so that the dependencies are listed first. Alphabetical serves no useful purpose, when it contradicts the proper build order. At least that's my opinion, anyway. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:27:00 up 10 days, 23:00, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.01, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
