Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/17/05 22:55 CST: > >>Okay guys, fop appears to be good now and blfs.pdf looks good. I'm >>reworking the OOo to install the large jdk-1.5 patch, and testing again. >> Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem >>still exists. Anyone have any additional objections that have not been >>discussed yet? > > > There is an entry in the JDK bug in Bugzilla about the JRE moz/firefox > plugin. Is this still an issue? >
No...that was my screwup. I had inadvertantly left in a patch from 1.4.2 that had been fixed in a different way. The gcc-3.4.2+-2 patch eliminated that issue. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
