Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 09/10/05 15:35 CST: > Yes, that is an option. OTOH, using the transient version would be > easier for us. It looks like it would only require a url change.
You mentioned you weren't in favor of using the transient version. But what I'm getting from this post is that you would rather use the transient version than the existing patch to make the current version work. Is this correct? Mind you, I don't care either way, I was just trying to inform you that using the transient version is not necessary, if your goal is to simply make the package work with GCC-4. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 15:37:00 up 161 days, 15:10, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.08, 0.09 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
