Archaic wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:38:33AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > >>The alternative is to use the gcc4 patch already in the LFS repo. > > > A possible idea is to create a patch to update 4.2.0 to 4.2.0a. I don't > know how intrusive the changes are, though, so I don't know if autoconf, > et. al. would need to be regenerated.
Yes, that is an option. OTOH, using the transient version would be easier for us. It looks like it would only require a url change. Looking at http://ntp.isc.org/bin/view/Main/SoftwareDownloads I think that the 4.20a point release is the way to go until 4.21 is released. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
