On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:59:12AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > I'm not sure that there is a real effect where these programs are > installed.
I was explicit enough. The effect I was referring to was cohesion between the books, not the usability of the software. > FHS says /usr/libexec is just fine. It also says that > /usr/lib/packagename is just fine. Doing a word search for libexec yields no results in the latest FHS pdf. > I'm inclined to lump all these types of programs in /usr/libexec > instead of a bunch of unneeded, though descriptive, directories. Descriptive is good. :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
