Randy McMurchy wrote: > Moot point, though, as we've already committed to using the client.mk > file to build the package. I'm not sure what your motive is in > even bringing it up.
Are you this suspicious of everyone. or just me? ;) I don't have a hidden motive or agenda, Randy. I just wanted to know why you included a question mark, indicating uncertainty. You've explained it, so, thanks. > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Main_Page > http://www.mozilla.com/ Thank you. > I have no idea what your message is here. cairo is installed on the > system, yet best I can tell Firefox does not use it. The input I > was looking for from everyone was sort of "Yes, Randy, not using > cairo sounds like a good idea", or "No, Randy, we should be using > that switch because we *know* that cairo is installed on the system, > why not use it (with perhaps a reason why)". :-) Cairo is on the system if you put it there... Am I missing something? My original statement concerning this was basically just agreement that we shouldn't just disable it, but look into whether it is useful, considering that there are many packages using it these days. > I will admit this thread confused me. I really never saw a solution > other than to download and install the about:config program for > Thunderbird, as this is the only way to get it until from what it > sounds like, Thunderbird-1.5 comes out. I'm sorry, I thought that there was more of a summary at the end of this thread than there is. I believe the desired effect can be achieved with a sed. The about:config extension in Thunderbird just makes it easy to view/modify the files. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
