On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:08:48 -0600 Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tushar Teredesai wrote: > > > > > > Agreed, it should either be /usr (my preference) or /usr/X11R7 > > > (the appropriate version). > > > > My preference is /usr/X11R7. > > Though that will break a lot of packages that hard code the paths to X > (I think most of them check /usr, /usr/X11R6, /opt/X11R6, ...). This, IMO, is a 'Good Thing' (tm). Packages with hardwired paths are evil and need to be fixed upstream. From our perspective it should only be a sed to fix in the mean time. I like /usr as I don't see why x-windows is any different to, say, bash. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
