Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/23/06 19:33 CST: > and any "Recommended" > package dependencies should state *why* there are "Recommended".
I won't argue with you there. And this would take time and some thought by someone to do it correctly. So, I trust that instead of sending in patches for packages that say "This package does not come with a test suite", that you'll instead start sending in patches with these descriptions of the recommendations. :-) JK, by the way. However, if you were to submit such patches, I'd bet they would go into the book faster than the ones you submit that say "This package does not come with a test suite". -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 19:39:00 up 121 days, 5:03, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.14, 0.34 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
