Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/23/06 19:49 CST: > Yes, this makes sense, and I can appreciate that. Is there perhaps a > better term to use then? To me, 'Recommended' will always be 'Optional, > but useful'.
That may be your interpretation. However, Richard made very valid points about this not too long ago, and it was determined that we needed to clarify what was meant. Now, what is meant is in the book and *we expect it to be read*. If then, after reading our explanation of what recommended is, one feels they must not follow that recommendation, how do you think that makes us feel? Me, it makes me feel that the person didn't care enough about the fact that somebody took the time to recommend (due to research and other knowledge gaining processes) something and decided to go ahead and "do it their way" anyway. Makes wanting to support that person a might difficult. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 19:56:00 up 121 days, 5:20, 3 users, load average: 0.04, 0.14, 0.20 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
