> > Hmm. Well, my knowledge of C++ isn't strong enough to say that's the > right idea or not. However, fedora is using the same patch, so it > seems safe: seem to be an extra qualification error. This now fail an gcc 4.1 as it is more strict on syntax. I correct lot of program is this way no pb with that
pgpuSmJnleuwc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
