El Lunes, 17 de Abril de 2006 20:15, Andrew Benton escribió: > Is that wise? As it stands LFS is out of date. Old gcc, old glibc, old > kernel headers. As soon as trunk moves to a newer toolchain everyone > will start using that. Why waste effort releasing a book that's already > obsolete?
Due that a newer toolchain will need at least another 2-3 months of testing and issues fixes. We need made more frecuent and well tested stable releases. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
