M.Canales.es wrote these words on 05/06/06 14:17 CST: > I think also that not. At least has no use in the present. > > I we (the blfs editors and/or the jhalfs team) need that or something similar > in the future, we could to discusse it then.
Actually, I can see a practical use for it, but since we have not integrated anything like that into the book yet, is why I felt it should be discussed. I can certainly see optional installation features to be tagged somehow or another as optional. And 'role="docs"' may end up being adopted. That way, for jhalfs builds, one would only have to say docs=yes or docs=no or whatever flag you guys use and then everywhere there is optional docs installation, it would turn it on or off. But as Manuel said, we could discuss it and implement it when and if it is ever desired. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:31:00 up 42 days, 2:08, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.12, 0.42 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
