Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 5/6/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Could we discuss the 'role="docs"' used in that patch?
> 
> I noticed that, but I didn't see any harm.  I'm indifferent on this
> one, though.  I'm ready to submit when this reaches a verdict.

I tend to agree.  No harm, not foul.

It could be a problem if different editors put in a lot of role
attributes with different values, but this seems reasonable and
potentially useful.

I don't see any reason to explicitly take it out.

However, I also see no reason to reevaluate every page to add this
specific role.  It may be desirable in the future, but not now and
certainly not before the 6.2 release.

  -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to