Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/12/06 14:53 CST: > >> Yes, please put it in the dependencies. We have several places where a >> package is in the dependencies just to regenerate docs. In this case, >> the help need to be generated and should be mainlined. > > But it is an *optional* tarball these dependencies would be required > for, therefore, I think these dependencies should be placed in a section > similar to: > > Optional (to build the documentation from the optional help tarball) > > right underneath the other optional dependencies. What do you think?
Agree. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
