Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/25/06 13:26 CST: > If anyone is interested in pam_console, let me know. It's not > difficult to get set up. Debian has also created pam_foreground which > is very similar. I haven't tried it yet.
I'm guessing that in order to use pam_console, the system must be set up with Linux-PAM already, right? And if so, is it worth trying to put a mention (with instructions) of pam_console on the Linux-PAM BLFS page? The last thing we probably want to do, though, is have to provide two sets of instructions for GVM (one with pam_console, one without). I'm asking you for your opinion on this one, Dan. I will be the first to admit that I (like DJ) haven't bothered to learn the details of all this stuff yet. My biggest thing was seeing how KDE responded to the new HAL/DBUS setup and if there was any major shakeup on the KDE side. And, BTW, there didn't appear to be any, so that is when I decided to go with the new HAL/DBUS for BLFS-6.2 -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 13:29:01 up 44 days, 5:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
