On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 21:33 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > I'm leaning to 6.2.0. Here's why: > > I don't know how to increment from 6.2 and still be within the LFS-6.2 > structure. BLFS-6.2.1 makes no sense if there wasn't a 6.2.0 version.
This is how most other projects do versioning though. If the microversion is undefined, 0 is implicit. Take a look of the file listings on your local GNU mirror. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
