Randy McMurchy wrote: > Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 01/11/07 11:04 CST: > >> Everything else is just dead and, in the worst case, should be removed >> before 6.2.0. I am talking about the Vim page, too. > > I'm not sure what Alexander is driving at, but the Vim-7.0 update is > tagged as high-priority and a blocker for the 6.2.0 release of BLFS. > > What is your point, Alexander?
The point is that the Vim-7.0 bug is trivial (just apply patches from the development LFS and pay attention to http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1937), and already open for more than 6 months. This gives food to the thought that nobody uses the graphical version of Vim. Such never-verified-by-editors pages should not be in the book. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
