Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 01/13/07 01:36 CST:

> Please keep in mind that the notes below are skewed in the sense that they 
> recommend a change if it fixes a compatibility issue with LFS SVN (even if 
> there is no problem with LFS-6.2).
> 
> [snip a whole bunch]

Alexander, your comments are invaluable. Thanks.


>   * subversion-1.4.2: I don't understand why you want to postpone the 
> update, despite the fact that this version is already installed on 
> quantum.linuxfromscratch.org.

This is being postponed due to the changes in the dependencies
required and the dependency changes, which are significant. Because
it is installed on quantum is of no value or consequence, a BLFS
editor didn't do the install, and unless somebody is willing to
provide the new dependency list (with perfect accuracy), I don't
see any advantage in updating the package. We simply don't have time
to test. If you can point out just *one* major enhancement that a
version update will provide, we will reconsider.

Please understand, on this one I just don't see the bang for the
buck. Please show me how updating Subversion to this version
provides significant improvement (to me, the BDB issue is trivial
and not worth considering as the FS based repo's are now
recommended).

Most importantly, thanks again Alexander for your invaluable
contributions.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
01:44:01 up 3 days, 1:58, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.16, 0.15
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to