Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/13/07 15:37 CST: > Yep. I just got hal-0.5.9 done on my system the other day. There are > some things still to be decided, like how to split up dbus + bindings.
This one due to the KDE binding sitution is a bit sticky. I'm guessing your biggest question is do we want the bindings combined into the main package installation, or break it out into a separate package. I sit on the fence. I like the way the SANE package is (frontends and backends on the same set of instructions), but I also like the way Gstreamer and the plugins are. Let's see if others have comments. I don't really care either way, but I can see it being a separate package for dependency purposes. Kdelibs(?) calls for the D-Bus bindings package which is dependent on the D-Bus package. Ditto other package that really call the D-Bus bindings package, knowing that D-BUS must be installed as well. > I'd like to get all the way built through gnome so I can test out HAL > through gnome-volume-manager, but maybe it's better to get it in > sooner. What do you think? Your call. I'm building GNOME now too, so perhaps it would be good to throw out what you have so far for D-BUS and HAL (I've already installed D-BUS, but not HAL). That way, I'd use the new HAL instructions you present and work from there. At least we'd both be on the same page. > So, yeah, all the stuff in the queue is getting closer. Good! Firefox and T-Bird, as well? :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 15:58:00 up 8 days, 20:55, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.06 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
