Thanks for looking at this, Bruce. On 4/20/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > Comments on the attached diff. > > It's a bit hard to look at the diff and understand what the final page > would look like, but a couple of comments: > > + <bridgehead renderas="sect4">Required</bridgehead> > + <para role="required"><xref linkend="expat"/> or <xref > linkend="pkgconfig"/> > + and <xref linkend="libxml2"/></para> > > Why is it expat *or* pkgconfig? These packages don't seem like they > would do the same thing.
I should have commented on this. You either need expat or libxml2, but the libxml2 check uses pkg-config. So expat || ( libxml2 && pkg-config ) I couldn't think of the right way to say this. > Do the Python bindings not get built by default any more? You removed > the --disable-python switch so I would guess that they don't. All the bindings are split into separate packages: glib, qt3, python, java. Randy said he would take on the task of handling the bindings. Look a little earlier in this thread. We'd agreed to put the core and bindings on separate pages to keep down the clutter. I think he's planning on having it look like the Perl modules page. Is that alright? > In making these types of reviews, wouldn't it be better to just build > the book on quantum or anduin and point to that so we can see everything > in context? Sure, I can do that. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dnicholson/blfs-dbus/general/dbus.html -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
