Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 5/30/07, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Also, I found in the xorg-server instructions >> '</full/path/to>Mesa-6.5.2'. And thank you very much for getting rid of >> that nasty sed! There is nothing wrong with the instructions as they >> are, but I skipped right over the word 'full' on the first run and gave >> a relative path. I don't know if it'd make a difference, but maybe >> 'absolute' instead of 'full' might draw a little bit more attention to >> it. Not a big deal, I messed up, but maybe it could save somebody else >> in the future. >> > > That's a good idea, thanks. It took me a long time to realize why I > never needed the sed in my build. It never occurred to me that it was > just because of the relative path even though it makes complete sense > once you think about it. > > -- > Dan > I recognized it right away, and of course, it was followed by burying my head in my hands! Why didn't I catch that a few months ago?!?!?!?!? :-) I just saw the unused paths in the Makefile first I suppose.
-- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
