On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:35:41AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote: > > Last time I checked there was development activity about porting > > dillo to FLTK, and Jeremy Henty was getting involved also. > > The result is probably very different from today's Dillo.
Actually the look and feel is very similar. The UI is basically the same. The fonts are nicer, of course! > Is Dillo currently (or with the patch) functional enough to be in > the book? Dillo Classic certainly works well enough to be useful. Is that enough? There won't be any more development on it, so if active support is a requirement for BLFS then it should go. Regards, Jeremy Henty -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
