Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote these words on 03/10/08 18:28 CST: > > >> Care to spell out your preferences ? To me, blfs has for long >> been somewhat pernickety about specifying sizes and SBUs in decimals. >> (I've always found some variation in my own build times, even for >> repeated builds when the cache should be "hot"). I'm happy to >> attempt to fit in with what I find, but a statement for "how small we >> ought to measure" would be useful. >> > > "Pernickity" ?? > > I had to look in the dictionary. *And you misspelled it* :-) > My dictionary has "persnickity", which would be the perfect word > in the context you used it. > FWIW, the correct word is "persnickety" so maybe you need to buy a new dictionary.
Joe -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
