Randy McMurchy wrote: > It appears you are correct! Oh, wait a minute, my dictionary actually > says this: > > per·snick·e·ty (p…r-sn¹k“¹-t¶) adj. 1.a. Overparticular about trivial > details; fastidious. b. Snobbish; pretentious. 2. Requiring strict > attention to detail; demanding. --per·snick“e·ti·ness n. > > So, in actuality, you're correcting my typographical error. How > nice of you to point that out. I noticed you appear serious in > your delivery as well. Boy, you've really contributed (you can > take the "boy" as you wish, I meant it literally) to this > discussion! > I was *not* serious, just following along in your "messing" with Ken. But interestingly enough, after I sent my response I found that "pernickety" is a valid British spelling of "persnickety" so Ken wasn't wrong either. And to make everyone happy, there's even a book titled "Persnickity".
Sorry to take up bandwidth with recursive trivialities. Joe -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
