Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/22/08 13:58 CST: > Hi, > > Yesterday, I was trying to install a Tcl/Tk application, when during > the build procedure, I noticed that the value of TCL_LIBRARY was my > usual build dir. > > Checking further I found a lot of same references in > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh > /usr/lib/tkConfig.sh
Some time ago when I changed the Tcl/Tk instructions to not use the old convoluted method we used to use (see previous versions of BLFS for specifics, it was ugly) I noticed this and brought it up as you have (check the archives if necessary). Because those references don't really do any harm, and nothing we could tell actually used them, we just left it as it is. Have you noticed something that it affects in a negative way? If so, what was it? Adding seds in just to fix something that doesn't affect anything (that was my observation then) doesn't seem worthwhile (meaning it doesn't really help anything, so why do it). If you've discovered something that it actually affects negatively, then by all means we should probably do it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:12:00 up 34 days, 5:00, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
