Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/22/08 14:40 CST: > Maybe at least a note in the book? so if a possible failure occurs, the > reader should suspect the cause of it and will report it back.
Well, I'm not a big fan of it. See below for the reason. However, after writing the stuff below I come to think that it wouldn't be a bad thing to do, just in case. > By the way we don't mention those scripts in the installed files. It is my belief that the tclConfig.sh script is not meant to be used by an end user. It is in /usr/lib. Most users would never know it is there. I look at it the same as the files we put in /usr/lib/package via the libexecdir setting. To me, files in /usr/lib or /usr/lib/package are not executables listed in our installed programs because they are not meant to be called directly. I could be wrong. Let's see what others have to say. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:47:00 up 34 days, 5:35, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.11, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
