On Wed, Jan 28, at 08:52 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > C'mon Ag. No need to get irritated. I can't remember how many times I've > updated something 'obvious' and had the build fail due to one character being > wrong. All I can say is that it has been a lot. I didn't say the patch was > wrong. I was commenting on general procedure. >
You know Bruce that I am not holding nothing against you and we are agree on principle. I just don't like people got ignored and Robert - although it was for a minor issue - got ignored once on December, let me find it: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2008-December/019180.html We are a community project, we are *not* a personal project. So when people got ignored repeatedly, (they) will stop from reporting. I felt in this case that the fix was obvious and it was (I just took an extra 30 seconds to be sure and re-render the book). If the commit ended up to be a bad sed command, someone by now - I know you built kde, Ken builds a good portion of it, Thomas I think and a great deal of users - will get notice it (ideally). In the meantime we've had a broken command and I wonder how it got unnoticed till now or why nobody report it. Do you ever wonder why we don't have many reports? Face it Bruce, we've failed to produce interest and to incorporate any such interest when it came out. > -- Bruce Regards, Ag. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
