On 6 August 2010 18:49, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > The following works for me. > > -- Bruce > > =================================================================== > --- general.ent (revision 8454) > +++ general.ent (working copy) > @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ > using an LFS-6.5 platform if you use > current package > sources. See <xref > linkend='package_updates'/> > for more information.</para>"> > +<!ENTITY svn_built "This package is known to build and work > properly > + using an LFS-SVN-"> > + > +<!ENTITY svn_built2 " platform."> > + > <!-- End special entities about LFS compatibility --> > > <!-- Part II --> > Index: server/databases/mysql.xml > =================================================================== > --- server/databases/mysql.xml (revision 8454) > +++ server/databases/mysql.xml (working copy) > @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ > existing BLFS instructions. Note that versions other than the one > shown > in the download URLs have not been tested in a BLFS > environment.</para> > > + <para>&svn_built;20100806&svn_built2;</para> > + > <bridgehead renderas="sect3">Package Information</bridgehead> > <itemizedlist spacing="compact"> > <listitem> > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
OK, you've convinced me. But I suppose that the distinction between checked and built needs to be maintained. I've revised it r8456. I've put the new svn entities into mailx and gamin, to prove both work (package versions are what I'm using, and the new tags are true). I haven't touched mysql because I'm not sure which version of LFS-svn you built it against. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
