On 10 August 2010 00:29, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> Meanwhile, I've got a question: When something builds and works >> with the versions currently in BLFS, both on LFS-6.6 and on recent >> LFS-svn, is it more useful to readers if I mark it as tested with >> LFS-6.6 or the LFS-svn version ? Anybody ? > > I would think the LFS-svn version because that was what was actually used. > > -- Bruce Maybe I wasn't clear. I've got several LFS systems on each of my two x86_64 desktop boxes, and I'm trying to keep them available and patched. So, the packages have been build both on 6.6 and on recent svn.
ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
