Ken Moffat wrote: > On 10 August 2010 00:29, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> Meanwhile, I've got a question: When something builds and works >>> with the versions currently in BLFS, both on LFS-6.6 and on recent >>> LFS-svn, is it more useful to readers if I mark it as tested with >>> LFS-6.6 or the LFS-svn version ? Â Anybody ? >> I would think the LFS-svn version because that was what was actually used.
> Maybe I wasn't clear. I've got several LFS systems on each of my > two x86_64 desktop boxes, and I'm trying to keep them available > and patched. So, the packages have been build both on 6.6 and > on recent svn. I'd still go with svn. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
