On 11/07/11 09:11, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 12:23 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>> On 10/07/11 01:16, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>>> On 07/09/2011 01:45 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>>>> On 04/07/11 09:42, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
> Taking only Gnome for an example, it's just too difficult. Isolating it 
> is *impossible* as there are way to many interdependent packages. Even 
> if you install to /opt/gnome now, you have several different modules to 
> account for in system locations (dbus, dconf, gconf, gio, gstreamer, 
> etc) and they cannot exist in an alternate directory tree, not to 
> mention the hoops to jump through to get all the data files in the right 
> locations under /usr/share for things like internationalization and even 
> pixmaps and icons. While I still haven't completed KDE, however, I 
> believe that if you review your installation logs, you'll find the same 
> is true there (or I suppose it is possible that KDE's conglomeration of 
> packages fits better into this model). Self contained packages like QT 
> and OpenOffice, I guess I can kind of understand. I used to use that 
> isolation scheme myself, but for most of the other things placed into 
> /opt today, I just don't see the purpose any longer as they are not 
> actually isolated installations, and removing those packages can 
> actually cause breakage.
I totally agree with DJ.
It is interesting that it is sufficient to have a single /usr
instructions for GTK2, but not for QT3/4. After all they are both
graphical toolkits are they not? What makes them different?
Going back to Gnome, I further purpose that we get rid of the version
directory under /etc/gnome. I wouldn't even mind if /etc/gnome was
replaced with just /etc. I don't see how it is possible having two
versions on Gnome working on a single system. Does any other
distribution have a /etc/gnome directory structure?
Regards,
Wayne.
> -- DJ Lucas
> 
> 
> 

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to