Thomas Trepl wrote: > On Monday 11 July 2011 23:31:48 Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> It is interesting that it is sufficient to have a single /usr >> instructions for GTK2, but not for QT3/4. After all they are both >> graphical toolkits are they not? What makes them different? > It is irrelevant. I think this kind of disussion is what slows BLFS down. We > have /opt-instructions for QT? Fine! We don't have them for GTK2? Fine! > Where is the problem? If someone feels that it is required to have GTK2 in > /opt, he may add (and hopefully further maintain) the instructions. Seems so > that for most people GTK2 in /usr is sufficient, thats fine and full-stop. > There should be nothing make us getting under pressure to follow those > selfmade standards. It costs time and energy which may be needed more on > other > parts of the book.
I agree. I am merely against removing what is already there. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
