Thank you for your message, Andy. Em 25-02-2012 09:27, Andrew Benton escreveu: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:05:20 -0800 (PST) > Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> guile-1.8.8 > Are you suggesting that we go back to guile-1.8.8? What others think > about this? Is it a good solution? > > Andy
I was trying to build gnucash-2.4.10, using what I used before in other LFS systems. I am happy to have succeeded, because without gnucash, for me, a desktop is useless, thus my worries. I know no other such program which can break a transaction in sub-levels. I build and use HomeBank 4.3, just to double check that all the main transactions are there and the sums coincide, but it cannot sub-level transactions, as far as I know, and seems to have been discontinued. I do not remember which one, in a distribution I have installed (Sabayon?), the upgrade always asks to remove the "unmaintained" homebank. Long ago I decided to keep guile-1.8.8, due to my impossibility of building gnucash, cannot remember if it was guile or other which failed to build. After gnucash was built, I searched other distributions for used guile and gnucash: ArchLinux 1.8.8 2.4.10 Fedora release 16 (Verne) 1.8.8 2.4.9 Ubuntu 11.10 1.8.8 2.4.7 openSUSE 11.4 "Celadon" 1.8.7 2.4.0 For me it is easy to keep guile-1.8.8 as I believe, I use it just for gnucash. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
