Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> guile-1.8.8 >> Are you suggesting that we go back to guile-1.8.8? What others >> think about this? Is it a good solution?
> I was trying to build gnucash-2.4.10, using what I used before in > other LFS systems. > > I am happy to have succeeded, because without gnucash, for me, a > desktop is useless, thus my worries. I know no other such program > which can break a transaction in sub-levels. > > I build and use HomeBank 4.3, just to double check that all the main > transactions are there and the sums coincide, but it cannot > sub-level transactions, as far as I know, and seems to have been > discontinued. I do not remember which one, in a distribution I have > installed (Sabayon?), the upgrade always asks to remove the > "unmaintained" homebank. > > Long ago I decided to keep guile-1.8.8, due to my impossibility of > building gnucash, cannot remember if it was guile or other which > failed to build. > > After gnucash was built, I searched other distributions for used > guile and gnucash: > > ArchLinux 1.8.8 2.4.10 > Fedora release 16 (Verne) 1.8.8 2.4.9 > Ubuntu 11.10 1.8.8 2.4.7 > openSUSE 11.4 "Celadon" 1.8.7 2.4.0 > > For me it is easy to keep guile-1.8.8 as I believe, I use it just for > gnucash. Perhaps this is a case for a static library. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
