Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:16:50 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> For me it is easy to keep guile-1.8.8 as I believe, I use it just for >>> gnucash. >> Perhaps this is a case for a static library. > > It's the guile command that fails trying to build a catalog of the slib > files. This is a scheme (Lisp) library, text files with lisp code in > them. If it was just c or c++ it wouldn't be so bad but this rubbish > smells like latex/texlive to me. This is an ex parrot. It has ceased to > be... > > In the book I see guile mentioned on the gnucash and slib pages > (obviously) as well as the pages for: gnutls, aisleriot, gnome-games, > gconf1, autogen and graphviz so reverting to guile-1.8.8 would have > implications to those other packages. The only one of those I install > is gnutls and it seems quite happy without guile. > > Reverting to guile-1.8.8 is the only way I can see of fixing gnucash. > Personally I'm happy with gnucash and slib out of the book ;) > Anybody else want gnucash, slib and guile-1.8.8?
Perhaps this ought to be discussed on the gnucash mailing list. Perhaps they have a patch for the more up-to-date supporting packages. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
