On Tue, 01 May 2012 16:00:50 +0100 "Armin K." <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 04:45 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > > So does that mean you want it left in the book? > > > > Andy > > If you think it's worth keeping and updating, yes. I don't think it's worth keeping and updating. > As I said, I link > firefox against xulrunner, so Firefox uses it, plus Totem*, Rhythmbox, > libproxy* and gecko-mediaplayer > > In BLFS, Firefox is built as standalone browser, so there are only 2 > packages left. I see Xulrunner listed as an optional dep of Icedtea6, Libproxy and Totem. I'd be happy to see those as external links pointing at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner > *Packages in the book - Xulrunner is optional there. Imho, libproxy can > be removed if necesary since it's only optional by glib-networking. Libproxy is an optional dep for Vlc, Neon and Glib-networking > But there is still java (openjdk). Let's see what's dj going to say > about this. If he's for, drop it. Fair enough. Ken, Bruce and Ragnar too. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
