Andrew Benton wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2012 16:00:50 +0100 > "Armin K." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 05/01/2012 04:45 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> So does that mean you want it left in the book? >>> >>> Andy >> If you think it's worth keeping and updating, yes. > > I don't think it's worth keeping and updating. > >> As I said, I link >> firefox against xulrunner, so Firefox uses it, plus Totem*, Rhythmbox, >> libproxy* and gecko-mediaplayer >> >> In BLFS, Firefox is built as standalone browser, so there are only 2 >> packages left. > > I see Xulrunner listed as an optional dep of Icedtea6, Libproxy and > Totem. I'd be happy to see those as external links pointing at > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner
I think that is fine. >> *Packages in the book - Xulrunner is optional there. Imho, libproxy can >> be removed if necesary since it's only optional by glib-networking. > > Libproxy is an optional dep for Vlc, Neon and Glib-networking > >> But there is still java (openjdk). Let's see what's dj going to say >> about this. If he's for, drop it. I think we are going to remove openjdk, but keep iced-tea. I've discussed with DJ, but he has the most experience with it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
