Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em sex, 14/9/12, Armin K. escreveu:
> Apologies for intruding here.
No problem. The reason for a post is to get input from whoever want to
comment.
> A I learned with you editors:
>
> ln -sfv ../lib/seamonkey-2.12.1/chrome/icons/default/seamonkey.png \
> /usr/share/pixmaps
>
> a relative link could be better?
>
> One reason I prefer everything explicit is to avoid error by inducing a
> minor one, just in case:
>
> ln -sfv ../lib/seamonkey-2.12.1/chrome/icons/default/seamonkey.png \
> /usr/share/pixmaps/seamonkey.png
>
> In this last form, if you did not have the directory, an error would
> trigger the problem.
Perhaps. The reason for a relative link is when the parent (in this
case /usr was moved), the link would remain correct. I don't think
that's an issue here. Of course the relative link is not wrong.
>>> mkdir -pv /usr/share/{applications,pixmaps}
> FWIW, I like better the second form.
I've already made that fix locally, and will update in the next commit.
-- bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
