On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I'm inclined to use the --without-magick-plus-plus option because it > does not seem ready yet. I asked on the IM developers list yesterday, > but have received no responses. > > What do you think? >
Looking back, magick++ is enabled by default, if the c++ deps are present, so this sounds like new breakage, rather than a new thing that isn't yet ready. Alternatively, perhaps the tests need to be updated. I've no idea what version is current, but it wouldn't be the first time that an IM version selected for the book had problems somewhere. Last time I looked, everything at IM had moved to forums and I thought their lists were dead or given over to spam - not the easiest of packages to look for known bugs. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
