Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> I'm inclined to use the --without-magick-plus-plus option because it >> does not seem ready yet. I asked on the IM developers list yesterday, >> but have received no responses. >> >> What do you think? >> > > Looking back, magick++ is enabled by default, if the c++ deps are > present, so this sounds like new breakage, rather than a new thing > that isn't yet ready.
I agree. > Alternatively, perhaps the tests need to be > updated. I've no idea what version is current, but it wouldn't be > the first time that an IM version selected for the book had problems > somewhere. Current is 6.7.9-6, the version I've been testing. > Last time I looked, everything at IM had moved to forums and I > thought their lists were dead or given over to spam - not the > easiest of packages to look for known bugs. I used: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21889 12 views, no replies. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
