On 07/28/2013 04:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I'm looking at samba-4.07 and have been able to build, test, and install > it. I'm trying to recall if there is an issue with samba4 that > interferes with other programs. Right now our references are to > > general/sysutils/mc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > > general/sysutils/autofs.xml: NFS (see <xref linkend="nfs-utils"/>) or > Samba (see <xref linkend="samba3"/>) > > gnome/deprecated/gnome-vfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > gnome/platform/gvfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> > kde/core/kde-runtime.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > multimedia/libdriv/xine-lib.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > multimedia/videoutils/vlc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > multimedia/videoutils/mplayer.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, > networking/netprogs/cifsutils.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> > networking/netlibs/libsoup.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> > > postlfs/security/stunnel.xml: <xref linkend="samba3-swat-config"/> > > What should be our position on samba3 vs samba4? Samba-4.0.0 was > released last December. > > http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.0.0.html > > -- Bruce >
It's fully compatible with samba3, but it installs headers in different locations. You'll have to override some packages (CFLAGS or whatever) to find samba headers - they are now in /usr/include/samba-4.0. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
