Armin K. wrote: > On 07/28/2013 04:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I'm looking at samba-4.07 and have been able to build, test, and install >> it. I'm trying to recall if there is an issue with samba4 that >> interferes with other programs. Right now our references are to >> >> general/sysutils/mc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> >> general/sysutils/autofs.xml: NFS (see <xref linkend="nfs-utils"/>) or >> Samba (see <xref linkend="samba3"/>) >> >> gnome/deprecated/gnome-vfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> gnome/platform/gvfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> >> kde/core/kde-runtime.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> multimedia/libdriv/xine-lib.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> multimedia/videoutils/vlc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> multimedia/videoutils/mplayer.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, >> networking/netprogs/cifsutils.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> >> networking/netlibs/libsoup.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> >> >> postlfs/security/stunnel.xml: <xref linkend="samba3-swat-config"/> >> >> What should be our position on samba3 vs samba4? Samba-4.0.0 was >> released last December. >> >> http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.0.0.html
> It's fully compatible with samba3, but it installs headers in different > locations. You'll have to override some packages (CFLAGS or whatever) to > find samba headers - they are now in /usr/include/samba-4.0. OK. I checked out cifs-utils-6.1 and it did not seem to have any problems finding it. The others will need to be checked out, but samba is optional on all of those. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
