I'm looking at samba-4.07 and have been able to build, test, and install it. I'm trying to recall if there is an issue with samba4 that interferes with other programs. Right now our references are to
general/sysutils/mc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, general/sysutils/autofs.xml: NFS (see <xref linkend="nfs-utils"/>) or Samba (see <xref linkend="samba3"/>) gnome/deprecated/gnome-vfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, gnome/platform/gvfs.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> kde/core/kde-runtime.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, multimedia/libdriv/xine-lib.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, multimedia/videoutils/vlc.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, multimedia/videoutils/mplayer.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/>, networking/netprogs/cifsutils.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> networking/netlibs/libsoup.xml: <xref linkend="samba3"/> postlfs/security/stunnel.xml: <xref linkend="samba3-swat-config"/> What should be our position on samba3 vs samba4? Samba-4.0.0 was released last December. http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.0.0.html -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
