On 09/21/2013 05:10 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > FWIW, I am reporting this. I do not need libusb for what I intended to > install, so no idea how relevant this is. > > I noticed that configure could not find libusb.h. With > > sed -i 's@include <libusb.h>@include <libusb-1.0/libusb.h>@g' configure > > it was found.
Speaking of libusb, we should probably update the book to libusbx-1.0.16. Libusbx started as a fork but now is supposedly merged back since it's listed as the official libusb release. Any objections? -- Igor Živković http://www.slashtime.net/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
