Em 21-09-2013 13:27, Igor Živković escreveu: > On 09/21/2013 05:57 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> About my previous post, libusb is listed as "Optional" in sdl, so, if it >> cannot be found by sdl's configure, should it not be fixed? > > Sorry for hijacking your thread. I don't think SDL uses that libusb but > libusbhid from BSD so it should probably be removed from dependencies.
I have: $ xzgrep libusb SDL-1.2.15-2013.09.21-10h46m50s.log.xz checking libusb.h usability... yes checking libusb.h presence... yes checking for libusb.h... yes Before using the sed to find libusb.h, I had: $ xzgrep libusb SDL-1.2.15-2013.09.21-10h13m08s.log.xz checking libusb.h usability... no checking libusb.h presence... no checking for libusb.h... no There is no mention to libusbhid, and the only places where hid is mentione are: $ xzgrep hid SDL-1.2.15-2013.09.21-10h46m50s.log.xz | grep -v hidden checking for hid_init in -lusbhid... no checking for hid_init in -lusb... no checking for usbhid... no Perhaps the best thing to do would really remove libusb as optional. But I cannot be sure, not much experience with sdl, just as a dependency for a package that does not need libusb. Or perhaps, there is a relationtionship with usb sound output devices? It also searches for usb.h and cannot find it. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
