On 09/21/2013 05:57 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > About my previous post, libusb is listed as "Optional" in sdl, so, if it > cannot be found by sdl's configure, should it not be fixed?
Sorry for hijacking your thread. I don't think SDL uses that libusb but libusbhid from BSD so it should probably be removed from dependencies. -- Igor Živković http://www.slashtime.net/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
