> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:47:05 +0100 > From: Igor ??ivkovi?? <cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr> > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail > > On 2014-02-26 13:45, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote: > > On 2014-02-25 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> > >> That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the > >> book > >> or not. We may want to review it in a few days as we sort out other > >> areas. > > > > I don't want sendmail back in the book as I believe it's rated worse > > in performance and security not to mention ease of configuration.
You _'believe'_: references, for both/each of the perf/sec counts? As for the build/config: ref readily-avail build-specs from other distros - e.g. Slackware. Removal of packages should be done in a considered manner: some of the recent stuff looks like folks _STAMPING_OUT_ things that they happen to not like, or have some 'bee in the head' about, or is beyond their ken, or they _just_can't_be_bothered_about_(TM), &usw. rgds, akhiezer > > I mean compared to postfix and exim. > > -- > Igor ??ivkovi?? > http://www.slashtime.net/ > -- > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
