On 2014-02-26 15:24, lf...@cruziero.com wrote: >> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:47:05 +0100 >> From: Igor ??ivkovi?? <cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr> >> To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> >> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail >> >> On 2014-02-26 13:45, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote: >> > On 2014-02-25 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> >> >> That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the >> >> book >> >> or not. We may want to review it in a few days as we sort out other >> >> areas. >> > >> > I don't want sendmail back in the book as I believe it's rated worse >> > in performance and security not to mention ease of configuration. > > > You _'believe'_: references, for both/each of the perf/sec counts?
Both. > As for the build/config: ref readily-avail build-specs from other > distros - > e.g. Slackware. > > Removal of packages should be done in a considered manner: some of the > recent stuff looks like folks _STAMPING_OUT_ things that they happen to > not like, or have some 'bee in the head' about, or is beyond their ken, > or they _just_can't_be_bothered_about_(TM), &usw. Sendmail was considered as not worth the effort. But patches are welcome, as always. -- Igor Živković http://www.slashtime.net/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
