On 07/05/2014 06:01 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 03:43:07PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: >> On 06/29/2014 09:55 PM, Armin K. wrote: >>> >>> Only thing that would change for editors is to make sure they use >>> chapter.xml.systemv or chapter.xml.systemd instead of chapter.xml for >>> inclusion of new packages. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >> >> It has been a week since I sent this out and I haven't got a single >> clear "yes" or "no" from any of the current developers. Should I give up >> hopes on this? >> >> Thanks and sorry for the noise. >> > I'm not planning on doing much development at the moment. I hope > to get back to looking at xindy (TeX) after I have built a current > system - perhaps this month, but for the moment BLFS is not a > priority for me. Whatever, I can usually adapt to the changes. > > What does concern me is the extra run time when editing - 'make' > already *feels* very slow (although what mostly takes the time is > working out why what should have been a trivial change has broken > the xml validation). > > I do not pretend to understand the _details_ of how this is > intended to work (I was not paying attention), but I suspect much of > that will need to be worked out as/when any issues become apparent. > > ĸen >
Everything should feel exactly like it does now. When building for systemd, my current implementation requires SYSTEMD=1 env var to be passed to "make". What you will notice however is "find" creating symlinks, but that takes a second at most. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
