On 07/22/2014 12:42 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 20-07-2014 11:30, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 19-07-2014 22:47, Armin K. escreveu: >>> On 07/20/2014 03:20 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> Author: fernando Date: Sat Jul 19 18:20:56 2014 New Revision: >>>> 13493 >>>> >>>> Log: Revert some modifications made by Armin. I would appreciate if >>>> Armin >>>> continued as before, asking for modifications, instead of doing them >>>> yourself. Thanks. You have all two systemd branches to play with. >>>> >>> >>> Why have simple instructions when you can have complicated ones. >>> >>> I wasn't aware that I am not allowed to modify the main book, sorry. >> > > I am still very bad in bed. But came here to reply and ask. So will > write as few words as possible. > > Problem is not to be allowed, but organization. Makes me feel more > comfortable. I intend to apply any patches and or requests you do. You > know much more than I do. I think there are two groups of editor, BLFS > and BLFS-systemd. I don't think you would fell comfortable if I did > modifications there. I don't like and don't want a fight, but a > collaboration, as we have modified already BLFS to facilitate systemd, > and even before you created the branch, I was already referring to it > (when was gnome branch). >
If it benefits us all, then I wouldn't mind at all. As you could see, the modifications were rather cosmetic than technical. > Therefore, am asking already one thing, please (which will divide in > many things, actually). > > I have had wishes to change many packages but was not sure. > > Two that I remember now are xoerg-server (libevent, for two or three > updates, I wanted to include libepoxy, but always saw it as delopment, > so did not) > > Also Mesa, I am using myself some of the modifications you did, again, > not sure if should put in the book. > > Xorg was maintained by Igor. I have doubts there. > > There are also other packages that need to be modified to follow your > modifications. > > I also have seen new packages you introduced and we have it as external > links. If we do not need them in the book because for us it is optional, > I would prefer to change the link to BLFS-systemd, instead of external. > You should decide on that. Modifications aren't yet done. Modifications to MesaLib, Cairo and Xorg Server (to name a few) still remain. > Please, give us patches of those or at least open tickets, so we can > eventually sync with yours. I mean not only the explicitly cited above, > there are others, but I read and could not immediately do, because am sick. > Everything is public. You can grab everything you like from blfs-book ML. It's hard enough to sync from one branch to another, yet alone two way. > > Finally, I wish the best for you systemd guys and congratulations. We > will be much helped by your branch, as I wrote above. My differences > were from some particular technical reasons, but you know that since > long time I am looking forward to haveing a BLFS systemd. > > > I have to go to bed, now, but will try to come back later today at > lieast to create the tickets for updates. > -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
